Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:34:52 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Berkeley DB 4.1 Message-ID: <l0s8sk$vlv$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20130912110937.GA34979@over-yonder.net> References: <l0s6lr$6o0$1@ger.gmane.org> <20130912110937.GA34979@over-yonder.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2CVWGXNAMMKGOFLCHIFLN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/09/2013 13:09, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:57:06PM +0200 I heard the voice of > Ivan Voras, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> And while the argument seems valid, it also doesn't have an estimate >> of which / how many ports will break with a more recent bdb. >=20 > FWIW, I've manually pushed all the systems I've managed to higher > versions than 4.2 for years. I remember having 4.6 around a lot. In > a quick look around now, I see 4.8 on everything but one system that's > running 4.7, servers and a couple workstations. I can't recall _ever_ > seeing a breakage. Yes, I've had WITH_BDB_VER?=3D48 in my standard /etc/make.conf I carry around in every system for so long that I don't even remember when I've added it :) ------enig2CVWGXNAMMKGOFLCHIFLN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEUEARECAAYFAlIxptwACgkQ/QjVBj3/HSzA+ACfdCQrTZw/ZpJwxog7p2QGOGJ0 cagAliy+czjibZuQC4LpdWfQzpxQ4OE= =Xmxq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2CVWGXNAMMKGOFLCHIFLN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l0s8sk$vlv$1>