From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 2 16:12:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA24138 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 16:12:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cimlogic.com.au (cimlog.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.51.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA24133 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 16:12:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jb@cimlogic.com.au) Received: (from jb@localhost) by cimlogic.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.7) id JAA00402; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 09:24:10 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jb) From: John Birrell Message-Id: <199809022324.JAA00402@cimlogic.com.au> Subject: Re: Why no ldconfig for ELF? In-Reply-To: <19980903000654.C23993@keltia.freenix.fr> from Ollivier Robert at "Sep 3, 98 00:06:54 am" To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 09:24:10 +1000 (EST) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Matthew N. Dodd: > > I think the FreeBSD ELF ld uses -rpath rather than -R though I'm not > > positive. > > Well, -R works as usual as shown in the on-line help although it is _not_ > documented in the man page :-( > > Remember though, it is not FreeBSD ELF but GNU binutils' one now... One of the bugs we haven't fixed is the aout man pages are installing over the top of the elf ones since binutils is built first. I'm not sure how we deal with this. -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message