From owner-freebsd-smp  Sun Nov 24 09:53:10 1996
Return-Path: owner-smp
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA00855
          for smp-outgoing; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 09:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clem.systemsix.com (clem.systemsix.com [198.99.86.131])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA00810;
          Sun, 24 Nov 1996 09:52:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clem.systemsix.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA25252; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 10:52:35 -0700
Message-Id: <199611241752.KAA25252@clem.systemsix.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: clem.systemsix.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
From: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>
To: Peter Wemm <peter@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-smp@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: sys/i386/isa icu.s 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 24 Nov 1996 01:42:06 PST."
             <199611240942.BAA06428@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 10:52:34 -0700
Sender: owner-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

> peter       96/11/24 01:42:03
> 
>   Modified:    i386/isa  icu.s
>   Log:
>   Fix accidental merge spam that broke the PC98 compile

I've been wondering how to attack that PC98 stuff.  Does anyone know if 
there is any chance at all of a PC98 machine running SMP code?

  The specific questions is:

#ifdef PC98
#define ICU_THIS
#else
#define ICU_THAT
#endif

If I then need to conditionalize for APIC_IO should I say NO:

#ifdef APIC_IO

#define APIC_THUS

#else

#ifdef PC98
#define ICU_THIS
#else
#define ICU_THAT
#endif

#endif

or YES:

#ifdef APIC_IO

#ifdef PC98
#define APIC_PC98
#else
#define APIC_PCAT
#endif

#else
 ...
--
Steve Passe	| powered by
smp@csn.net	|            FreeBSD