Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:15:23 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Ulrich Spoerlein <q@uni.de> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USE_SDL Message-ID: <20030217121523.GE42615@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030217113636.GD3801@galgenberg.net> References: <20030217060343.16587.qmail@web13505.mail.yahoo.com> <20030217113636.GD3801@galgenberg.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--lkTb+7nhmha7W+c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:36:36PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > On Sun, 16.02.2003 at 22:03:43 -0800, David Yeske wrote: > > I wanted to get feedback on USE_SDL. Most sdl ports have to redefine > > things like sdl-config, -lSDL, or SDL/SDL.h. Maybe USE_SDL in > > bsd.port.mk would save time, add consistency, and reduce duplication. > > This is only an example, and it has not been tested well.=20 >=20 > Wouldn't it be better to finally get rid of the SDL Version <-> Library > mis-match? >=20 > sdl12 installs itself as sdl11 where nearly all ports want just sdl?? > Why is that? Seconded, that would be very nice. I understand why it was necessary in the past, but nowadays it's just an annoyance. However, a USE_SDL knob would st= ill be useful IMHO. --Stijn --=20 "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in." -- Kim Alm, alt.sysadmin.recovery --lkTb+7nhmha7W+c3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+UNJbY3r/tLQmfWcRAuLZAJ4mn8y7+lv7RERYcagdHXAoXwIfdgCbBrN+ jFBeY/es2DFLQWRqBmggwrk= =9hnb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lkTb+7nhmha7W+c3-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030217121523.GE42615>