From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Dec 2 04:17:32 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA25960 for chat-outgoing; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 04:17:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from wakko.visint.co.uk (wakko.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA25944 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 04:17:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@visint.co.uk) Received: from dylan.visint.co.uk (dylan.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.180]) by wakko.visint.co.uk (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA15610; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 12:17:05 GMT Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 12:17:05 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome To: behind brown eyes cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: annoying spammers... In-Reply-To: <199712020334.WAA00797@flash-gordon.haven.boston.ma.us> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 1 Dec 1997, behind brown eyes wrote: > According to Stephen Roome: > > If their service provider doesn't want to know, how about the US courts, I > > don'y know about you, but if someone started spamming in my name (or on my > > behalf ?) I'd make damn sure they were sorry, even if it did include > > hiring some laywers. [snip] > I got this off of Phil Agre's Red Rock Eaters mailing list > (rre-request@weber.ucsd.edu). It seemed appropriate to the topic at hand. It's perfect,I couldn't imagine a better example, I'm glad that there is some justice! It's almost worth quoting cases like this in replies to spammers who just don't get it. [snipped the court judgment stuff] Many thanks, I was having a really dull day until I saw that! Steve -- Steve Roome - Vision Interactive Ltd. Tel:+44(0)117 9730597 Home:+44(0)976 241342 WWW: http://dylan.visint.co.uk/