Date: 22 Oct 2000 03:00:37 -0700 From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Cc: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.ORG>, Jim Mock <jim@lust.geekhouse.net>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New GNOME hacks, etc. Message-ID: <vqcvguljiuy.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Sat, 14 Oct 2000 13:52:38 -0500" References: <20001011134155.A1323@envy.geekhouse.net> <20001011161408.J48659@FreeBSD.org> <vqcd7h3g6ei.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20001014075255.M95891@puck.firepipe.net> <20001014135238.T95891@puck.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> * Done. This hasn't been tested very well, other than that it compiles * cleanly. However, I'd like to see a patch for bsd.port.mk first, then * perhaps MTREE_FILES+= for KDE & GNOME ports. * * Probably it should be tested on bento to make sure it doesn't break the * current method of doing things. * * BTW, I think the *_file() functions in lib/file.c are HACKSHACKSHACKS! * *nudge jkh ;-)* Thanks, I applied the patches and added it to the chroot tarball for 4-stable in the middle of the latest run. The build is almost over, it seems to work fine. Of course, it doesn't test the new functionality since it is using the current ports tree. :) If you can give me a mtree file for kde-2 or something, I can locally modify the tree and test that too. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcvguljiuy.fsf>