From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jul 27 15:22:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA23949 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Mon, 27 Jul 1998 15:22:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from indigo.ie (nsmart@ts05-043.dublin.indigo.ie [194.125.220.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA23825 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 1998 15:22:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rotel@indigo.ie) Received: (from nsmart@localhost) by indigo.ie (8.8.8/8.8.7) id XAA00990; Mon, 27 Jul 1998 23:12:04 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from rotel@indigo.ie) From: Niall Smart Message-Id: <199807272212.XAA00990@indigo.ie> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 23:11:38 +0000 In-Reply-To: ; Robert Watson Reply-To: rotel@indigo.ie X-Files: The truth is out there X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(3) 11/17/96) To: Robert Watson , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inetd enhancements (fwd) Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Jul 27, 4:15pm, Robert Watson wrote: } Subject: inetd enhancements (fwd) > > This seems like security to me -- the binding issue is especially relevant > to firewall hosts (multi-homed). Binding isn't going to be especially useful because it can only be enforced with ipfw rules. And why does inetd need to be modified to support chroot? Doesn't: ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/chroot chroot /xyz ftp work? Niall -- Niall Smart, rotel@indigo.ie. Amaze your friends and annoy your enemies: echo '#define if(x) if (!(x))' >> /usr/include/stdio.h To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message