From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Feb 21 16:05:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78127CE8251; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579B1999; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id A986A1E6A; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:05:03 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Vsevolod Stakhov Cc: Mathieu Arnold , "Mikhail T." , Jan Beich , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Misuse of PORTREVISION (Re: svn commit: r434379 - head/multimedia/x265) Message-ID: <20170221160503.GA53020@FreeBSD.org> References: <20170218210541.82AA915F6@freefall.freebsd.org> <2dd922e8-af48-6245-752a-061af7a91a5a@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2dd922e8-af48-6245-752a-061af7a91a5a@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:05:04 -0000 On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:56:17PM +0000, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: > As I've said many times, we should just kill these outdated tools and > use pkg (not make!) to resolve build depends. It is merely a political > decision not technical one. Well make(1) is not an outdated tool. :) Also keeping pkg(8)'s involvement until very late in the packaging stage make the process more transparent and easier to debug/hack on. I personally like it the way it is now, and I understand why you're having traction with this proposal of yours. ./danfe