From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar  4 02:01:19 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5789F1065670
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Thu,  4 Mar 2010 02:01:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mj@feral.com)
Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F24D8FC19
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Thu,  4 Mar 2010 02:01:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] (m206-63.dsl.tsoft.com [198.144.206.63])
	by ns1.feral.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2421I6c098039
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:01:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mj@feral.com)
Message-ID: <4B8F1475.10100@feral.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:01:25 -0800
From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100216 Thunderbird/3.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
References: <3bbf2fe11002281655i61a5f0a0if3f381ad0c4a1ef8@mail.gmail.com>	<3bbf2fe11003020724m14bebf74y9fa3906418b7cf11@mail.gmail.com>	<4B8D3016.2070301@feral.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031334g4591c1a3lc52dfb898f728ee2@mail.gmail.com>	<20100303214424.GA53790@sandvine.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031348q4c1fcccfxd19da32875b43f56@mail.gmail.com>	<4B8EDAE8.3080401@feral.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031357o518d6028m8157d9110a9122f3@mail.gmail.com>	<4B8F1137.7070102@feral.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031752l5f9066a0nb511f097c81f726c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4B8F12D7.6070401@feral.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B8F12D7.6070401@feral.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Default is to whitelist mail, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3
	(ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]);
	Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: How is supposed to be protected the units list?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SCSI subsystem <freebsd-scsi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:01:19 -0000

On 3/3/2010 5:54 PM, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> I'd only say that is is possible that the patch *uncovers* an existing 
> problem.
>

It's HEAD. Barring a negative comment from Scott, Alexander or Justin, 
I'd say put it in.