From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 25 22:42:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9881916A4CF for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:42:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web21429.mail.yahoo.com (web21429.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.232.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A3F543D46 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mjacob44@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040825224245.3056.qmail@web21429.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [146.174.53.5] by web21429.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:42:45 PDT Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:42:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob To: Scott Long , Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <412D0868.9060203@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Matthew Jacob cc: sos@freebsd.org cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: potential re change for 5.3? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:42:45 -0000 I'm a bit late in catching up on this... I just needed to know what the architecture is- it's now fairly clear that it is "don't sleep in driver top half". That being said, then the change to isp should go into 5.3, yes. One can argue whether this is the 'right' architecture or not. I think the points being made are good- I don't want to really debate the wisdom/unwisdom of it at this point. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail