From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 15 20:54:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0C516AB99 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 20:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from technical@ultratrends.com) Received: from server1.ultratrends.com (S01060004e20310fa.rd.shawcable.net [70.65.49.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F1843D48 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 20:54:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from technical@ultratrends.com) Received: from server1.ultratrends.com (IDENT:chuck-the-bsd-deamon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.ultratrends.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4FKsWtS047958 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:54:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from trodat@server1.ultratrends.com) Received: from localhost (trodat@localhost) by server1.ultratrends.com (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k4FKsWDE047955 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:54:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from trodat@server1.ultratrends.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:54:32 -0600 (MDT) From: TRODAT To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20060515145152.V46728@server1.ultratrends.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Security Testing on Production Systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:54:35 -0000 List, This is a hot topic as of late where I work: Once a system has gone into 'production' should testing, specifically security, be done on it if the system could be broken by the test itself? What is your take on this issue and why? Thanks for any ideas and feedback. Rob.