From owner-cvs-all Sat Dec 19 09:16:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA26656 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 09:16:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA26639; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 09:16:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA10209; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 09:13:04 -0800 (PST) To: S ren Schmidt cc: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer), julian@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ps keyword.c src/lib/libc/i386/sys sigsuspend.S src/sys/i386/linux linux.h linux_dummy.c linux_m In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 19 Dec 1998 17:28:01 +0100." <199812191628.RAA07787@freebsd.dk> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 09:13:00 -0800 Message-ID: <10197.914087580@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Excuse me, but I thought the "prime directive" was to test such things > BEFORE they where committed?? I have to echo this sentiment, and not because all of us haven't broken -current in the past (even Soren here can't make such a claim) but because this particular change was already somewhat politically delicate (some had expressed reservations) and Julian knew that going into this. My point? If you're going to take on any contraversial task in FreeBSD, folks, then you'd please also better not screw it up unless you want it to suddenly become 10X more contraversial. This is no more or less than common sense, I think. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message