From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun Apr 21 07:24:45 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA20399
          for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 07:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA20392
          for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 07:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <14539(11)>; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 07:24:07 PDT
Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177475>; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 07:21:22 -0700
To: David Muir Sharnoff <muir@idiom.com>
cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, core@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/1019 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 19 Apr 96 03:26:17 PDT."
             <199604191026.DAA05180@idiom.com> 
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 07:21:15 PDT
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <96Apr21.072122pdt.177475@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199604191026.DAA05180@idiom.com> you write:
>I agree in theory, but there is one snag: detecting faxes is
>uaually an interactive process that varies based on the type
>of modem.

I don't think there's any need to have one getty to handle both
FAX and data.  HylaFAX handles this situation just fine, by exec'ing
the data getty when it recognizes a data call.  Let the FAX software
handle the FAX calls and concentrate on handling data right =)

  Bill