From nobody Thu Jan 26 16:26:22 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4P2mLD3rsxz3cFHc for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4P2mLC36d2z3ncJ for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:26:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it Received: from [10.1.2.18] (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 30QGQMLb097047 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:26:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:26:22 +0100 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: Any reason to not implement VRRP in FreeBSD? Content-Language: en-US To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <3f0f88f77e77faf559607d0a8117aea252b7b5c0.camel@stormshield.eu> From: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: <3f0f88f77e77faf559607d0a8117aea252b7b5c0.camel@stormshield.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.80 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4P2mLC36d2z3ncJ X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 1/26/23 17:08, Nicolas MASSE wrote: > Is there currently any reason to not have an implementation of VRRP > inside FreeBSD? https://www.freshports.org/net/freevrrpd (I remember I used it in the past, many many years ago; when CARP was introduced in base, I switched, so I don't know how good it works today). bye av.