From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Jan 11 09:48:07 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F38CAA055 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:48:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9335718E7 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:48:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v0B9m7su012091 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:48:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 215951] [maintainer] cad/openvsp: update to 3.10.0 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:48:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:48:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215951 --- Comment #1 from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com --- Hi Barek, Thanks for taking the time to review the patch, however I don't understand = the changes to the summary and the flag. I received this note from=20 Vladimir Krstulja in a previous PR (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215307) "Thanks for the patch. When you submit such a patch, please make sure you p= ut the summary in "category/portname: Summary here" format, without "[maintain= er]" hacks. Flagging the attachment as maintainer-approved is sufficient. Also, maintainer-feedback(+) flag should only be set if it was previously reqeuested, and it wasn't." --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=