From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 05:55:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1557216A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 05:55:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A470E43D31 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 05:55:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBL5tTTM028426; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:55:29 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id iBL5tTqG028425; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:55:29 -0800 Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:55:29 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Charlie Schluting Message-ID: <20041221055528.GA27519@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <41C784DC.5020805@schluting.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41C784DC.5020805@schluting.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firewalling with tunnels, and/or ipv6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 05:55:27 -0000 --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 06:05:16PM -0800, Charlie Schluting wrote: > Ok, I've got a v6 tunnel, and to make it work I had to "allow ipv6 from= =20 > " in ipfw. From what I understand, I have to make a completely= =20 > different set of rules for ipv6, and load them using the -6 flag. >=20 > Correct so far? ip6fw is an entierly different beast from ipfw. There is no -6 option to ipfw. Use ip6fw instead. If 6.x we should have ipv6 support in ipfw and ip6fw should be gone. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBx7rQXY6L6fI4GtQRAkBNAJ9R16Bhddf/JIvsRnxbUZAZEOOoeACgtP/N d8KFGuf9ZPJIhLElywdb/tk= =z2Fz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--