From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Feb 28 08:50:52 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780A0CF1054; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:50:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5663AED9; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:50:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 6E178232; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:50:46 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Mark Linimon , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r434867 - in head: biology/avida biology/gmap devel/k8048 devel/kyra devel/php-uprofiler multimedia/libde265 net-mgmt/fastnetmon Message-ID: <20170228085046.GA89691@FreeBSD.org> References: <201702261256.v1QCufsh008639@repo.freebsd.org> <8a75178e-f8b8-e52c-b118-c6781ed5393e@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a75178e-f8b8-e52c-b118-c6781ed5393e@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:50:52 -0000 On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:36:00AM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 26/02/2017 ?? 13:56, Mark Linimon a ??crit : > > Author: linimon > > Date: Sun Feb 26 12:56:41 2017 > > New Revision: 434867 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/434867 > > > > Log: > > Mark various ports as broken on armv6: invokes x86 asm. > > Shouldn't they be marked as ONLY_FOR_ARCH=i386 amd64 instead of listing > all arches that are not those two ? Actually original message is misleading: the fact that port does invoke x86 assembler often means "locking primitives are not implemented for $arch" or that the port uses non-portable time keeping instead of doing it in a CPU-agnostic way (and thus might be quite easy to patch). In all these cases Mark should've probably found what the real issue is and provided better BROKEN messages. :-) ./danfe