From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Dec 12 17:06:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653AA1D676F for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47YgFV27Gsz3NTR for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4906C1D676E; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CE11D676D for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47YgFV1CPRz3NTQ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 08D4111520; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:06:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Lars Engels Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/llvm80 port on 12.1 References: <20191212154207.GL5400@e.0x20.net> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 18:06:52 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:06:54 -0000 Lars Engels writes: > So it looks like on 12.1 the mesa-dri port can use the base llvm instead > of the one from ports and save all people running Xorg almost 1 GB of > disk space? Does the patch in bug 242607 help?