From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 17 08:01:31 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA16848 for current-outgoing; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 08:01:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from bagpuss.visint.co.uk (bagpuss.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA16824; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 08:01:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from bagpuss.visint.co.uk (bagpuss.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.1]) by bagpuss.visint.co.uk (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA09612; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 16:01:13 GMT Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 16:01:13 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome cc: current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -current and -stable mailing lists In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Matthew Thyer writes: >This is ridiculous. > >FreeBSD 3.X is CURRENT! how about 2.1-past 2.2-present 3.0-future which actually explains it, but then again, so does just the number, but in order to actually make it all understandable for new folks: 2.1-previous 2.2-current (or simply 2.2-release) 3.0-experimental Someone could even put more information about each release in the readme.txt file at the top of ftp tree for each one. Steve Roome. -- FreeBSD: What other choice is there ?