From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 23:10:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843E81065670 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 23:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD2A8FC08 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 23:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q75NAbtI002403; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:10:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q75NAaUu002400; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:10:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:10:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Marco Muskus In-Reply-To: <501EE348.9020609@une.net.co> Message-ID: References: <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <20120805162915.GB5028@hemlock.hydra> <501EE348.9020609@une.net.co> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 06 Aug 2012 01:10:37 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 23:10:41 -0000 >> really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best. > > Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use L2ARC/ZIL > on SSD. if... better just move heavy used things on SSD and rest on HDD. really it's fastest.