From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 27 00:38:28 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657A016A4EA
	for <openoffice@freebsd.org>; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 00:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B51344035
	for <openoffice@freebsd.org>; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 00:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mb@imp.ch)
Received: from nbs.imp.ch (nbs.imp.ch [157.161.4.7])
	by mail.imp.ch (8.12.9p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h8R7c2M6029114;
	Sat, 27 Sep 2003 09:38:03 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from Martin.Blapp@imp.ch)
Received: from cvs.imp.ch (cvs.imp.ch [157.161.4.9])
	by nbs.imp.ch (8.12.10/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h8R7c2wh16445766;
	Sat, 27 Sep 2003 09:38:02 +0200 (MES)
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 09:38:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch>
To: Barry Pederson <bp@barryp.org>
In-Reply-To: <3F74F010.8000403@barryp.org>
Message-ID: <20030927093454.T22334@cvs.imp.ch>
References: <3F74F010.8000403@barryp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: openoffice@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OO 1.1RC5 & FreeBSD 5.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>,
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>,
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 07:38:28 -0000


Hi,

I compiled it on a pre 5.2 box. And there rtld is installed
in /libexec/ instead of /usr/libexec.

Yes, a symlink does help. Maybe I should add something to
the notes ...

Martin

> ---------
> ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found
> Abort trap
> ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found
> Abort trap
> ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found
> Abort trap
> ---------
>
> As a workaround, I tried setting up a symlink:
>
>     ln -s /usr/libexec /libexec
>
> and that seems to allow OO to work fine.  Are you guys perhaps building
> the binaries on a box that has a similar symlink?