From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 15:05:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B68106564A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC918FC14; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9503068EA; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 77A189F2A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:05:48 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Damian Weber References: <86r4tqotjo.fsf@ds4.des.no> <6E26E03B-8D1D-44D3-B94E-0552BE5CA894@FreeBSD.org> <20120610145351.GA1098@reks> <86ehpmp6xq.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:05:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86ehpmp6xq.fsf@ds4.des.no> ("Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rg?= =?utf-8?Q?rav=22's?= message of "Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:51:45 +0200") Message-ID: <86r4tlnb1v.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Gleb Kurtsou , "Simon L. B. Nielsen" Subject: Re: Default password hash X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:05:49 -0000 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > There's a world of difference between switching the default to an > algorithm we already support and which is widely used by other operating > systems, and switching to a completely knew and untested algorithm. ouch. s/knew/new/. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no