From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 11:31:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739BAA78 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A97282 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tom.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r0PBVMtU083476 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:31:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.4 kib.kiev.ua r0PBVMtU083476 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r0PBVM0P083475 for toolchain@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:31:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:31:22 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removing default build of gcc Message-ID: <20130125113122.GN2522@kib.kiev.ua> References: <74D8E686-3679-46F2-8A08-4CF5DFC020CA@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KDakB1N7OkbC0NTe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <74D8E686-3679-46F2-8A08-4CF5DFC020CA@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tom.home X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:31:29 -0000 --KDakB1N7OkbC0NTe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:41:11AM +0000, David Chisnall wrote: > Hi All, >=20 > In 10.0, the plan is not to ship any GPL'd code, so I'd like to start dis= connecting things from the default build, starting with gcc. I've been run= ning a gcc-free system for a while, and I think all of the ports that don't= build with clang are now explicitly depending on gcc. Does anyone have st= rong opinions on when would be a good time for head on x86 and x86-64 to de= fault to not building gcc? To clarify: there is no plans to not ship any GPLed code for 10.x. Instead, there are still plans to ship working 10.x. Please do not consider the personal opinion as the statement of the project policy. --KDakB1N7OkbC0NTe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRAm0KAAoJEJDCuSvBvK1Bvk8P/3RQkq8ys5ljpUDnOEUzelTr 312rbkUV4LNpWr/yO6bnnmnbwdvSLZgMB5jvzQwLqBIs4kGiRdxT6sFrQOr7T7se VRVnduI07P491fmyZu1WMWFsxB//vQ7A7OQIOsWWFubmWQMcgQKpuQ2wPTWOJRph vYI0Efnslr/BB9QBHXAregFK+MZ4iwc0BwN6ZJUYJeZWafzstBE+WBYAVB44aspB X5ZEcOQRx/TnTP3kG6XO5UHMs50koI7dW7nxcTj6UZWbuIYABTEOKSJDFxCCPT6k +k2FlQryf5Efljd7E5byb9wYdGe8qm7CjjMSpIvi8aVfQ2VJBgOrSbbtDO7ac9Nh WR82SjR9jNF5SEJ3y5wKcj4Km1K2nmmfix8ZQGu/OirCT/F1taNUS1OG+rUBd2oM IrNW1KIuyR73fCL7MttZMPjYVza8UL5PbophrT2CdZy810bUhgVCNmztInyhMUlE se24HnvO+FEYJOQFrCpBFIzH0QhFTu9F/srZCZqFXMByzbBb+UjjinUGOJQB3J35 8C0tpOjA3IvDtz+hhG9euYhi74aod4iIDHYLWe8mRnYxaeVjBJ5p6y+RBDhLF0vx FvNQ8ZZXdtgUM8fgvGYQlxKDgUAGXVz1101zoa+fiSK5+sDJavx9ojG0P7uoH60o wl1hQRbbOb8KeyXVthlt =1iFJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KDakB1N7OkbC0NTe--