From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 08:48:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B9216A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75C813C457 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HgdAJ-00060g-W5 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:47:56 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:47:55 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:47:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:47:12 +0200 Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <002201c786a2$1ff7b5a0$0202a8c0@artemis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3045178C15BDACE78D34BF8D" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) In-Reply-To: <002201c786a2$1ff7b5a0$0202a8c0@artemis> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: RE : NFS with Dynamic IP clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:48:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3045178C15BDACE78D34BF8D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alexandre DELAY wrote: > Why not, but my probem is that my NFS server must accept 300 clients. > Using a VPN for each client will probably use a lot of processor ressou= rces. If you're using NFS already and you're happy with it, then you might not = need to encrypt the VPN connections, just use them for tunneling. --------------enig3045178C15BDACE78D34BF8D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGLxWXldnAQVacBcgRAj3jAJwP7fD2+0pJRJQmwgXe297mrGJHMgCgmAHI ycBvhJtY5wwnRnN/LztA+J8= =0X4+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3045178C15BDACE78D34BF8D--