Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:47:12 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RE : NFS with Dynamic IP clients Message-ID: <f0n4iv$dqj$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <002201c786a2$1ff7b5a0$0202a8c0@artemis> References: <A46DA26D-C9FA-4532-BC09-0765C2B8CD33@mac.com> <002201c786a2$1ff7b5a0$0202a8c0@artemis>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3045178C15BDACE78D34BF8D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alexandre DELAY wrote: > Why not, but my probem is that my NFS server must accept 300 clients. > Using a VPN for each client will probably use a lot of processor ressou= rces. If you're using NFS already and you're happy with it, then you might not = need to encrypt the VPN connections, just use them for tunneling. --------------enig3045178C15BDACE78D34BF8D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGLxWXldnAQVacBcgRAj3jAJwP7fD2+0pJRJQmwgXe297mrGJHMgCgmAHI ycBvhJtY5wwnRnN/LztA+J8= =0X4+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3045178C15BDACE78D34BF8D--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f0n4iv$dqj$1>