From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 4 20:48:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A80816A4DD for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:48:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AFA43D5A for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:48:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so3058553pye for ; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:48:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=CQZ0R/RcsYqmS2rbuVhA/jYh0oYf6VYrZZp0MVS84VJRqurVafvZi/OK+GkmghOPlCyRzzwcYvT4kzo7tvVPDu3bOyptjZ/Nhpxy9Io+6I9Loho/vMKqBsM3Z0vg+W4R0JdnJC1JgEpkbcmtJt+D651J/9pVon/JMiJ2FN3cmfU= Received: by 10.35.41.12 with SMTP id t12mr10924144pyj; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:48:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pres1750.airedalians.com ( [75.7.74.134]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id r15sm5219915nza.2006.09.04.13.48.30; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:48:30 -0700 (PDT) From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: Perry Hutchison Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:48:28 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <10609040708.AA17675@pluto.rain.com> <200609040750.30916.donaldjoneill@gmail.com> <10609041855.AA19240@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <10609041855.AA19240@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609041548.29027.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Word processor for 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:48:32 -0000 On Monday 04 September 2006 13:55, Perry Hutchison wrote: > > > Try to save yourself as much pain as possible. Building openoffice > > from ports tends to fall in the category of pain. > > So it would seem :( > > I thought the whole point of the Ports Collection was to avoid this > sort of problem. That's the idea, and in most cases that's true. The ports system just keeps getting better and better. However,there are some ports that are just a pain to build and install. Either they can be tricky to do, they take a really long time, or both. OpenOffice falls in there. I'll avoid building it and use a pre-built package. After you install it, you'll find that it shows up for an update because two lines were swapped in the Makefile. Since I don't care to accidentally be rebuilding openoffice because of this, I have +IGNOREME in /var/db/pkg/en-openoffice.org-US-2.0.3, it doesn't show up as needing an upgrade. Don