From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 03:39:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 270F1178 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 03:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD0ABD24 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 03:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-18-117.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.18.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772613CE1E; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 04:30:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id sB13UTj9004579; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 04:30:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 04:30:29 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Alberto Mijares Subject: Re: Install package inside a no-networked jail from outside Message-Id: <20141201043029.c1fd9321.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <547BCC8C.6010509@gmail.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Luzar X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 03:39:05 -0000 On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:52:49 -0430, Alberto Mijares wrote: > This was my first approach; however, you need to bootstrap pkg and > AFAIK this is not possible without networking. BTW, I think pkg should > be installed by default now. It is installed in the special incarnation that the "OS pkg" does fetch the current "port pkg". This approach makes it easier to continuously develop pkg and improve its features. However, the call for a "basic functional pkg" in the OS is justified and understandable, so you can have a tool to install binary packages from the installation media - except, of course, the installation media also contains a "port pkg" that is being installed first, so it can then proceed to install the intended packages. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...