From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 15 09:03:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA12928 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:03:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA12923 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:03:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA07569; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:03:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: John Fieber cc: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , Mike Smith , Karl Pielorz , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: R-Day, 15th October, 1998 (BST or similar ;-) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:29:21 CDT." Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:03:38 -0700 Message-ID: <7565.908467418@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > one...yech! It is a foregone conclusion that 3.0 is not going to > be a stunning release, what with half the ports collection broken > and the like....what is another wee little bump? :-) I think it's important to distinguish between normal bumps in the road and the migrating turtles you're running over. A "broken" ports collection is by no means equivalent to the ELF kernel issue and should not be erroneously confused for such. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message