From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:13:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B770716A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:13:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AC543D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:13:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i12so47519wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:13:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=grePEepW15Lqrsk96Z2uA1GPN1WdGAJAmwbgPwyHoBuQhyfIJZaOOYp5OixOrexHPsQy5iWCHXXwjA0EmYz9mnMJc8+9HmUyGg3pSx1mnS/HONTqUbwK7QDmt7ysn6/HfIMuyeN87XLnyoNQie+BLC7PpPEUaTJUsUxbOoOv0Ps= Received: by 10.54.43.11 with SMTP id q11mr117409wrq; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.61.2 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:13:50 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: Sean Hafeez In-Reply-To: <491A44A6-1409-4D9E-AEFD-2B8665D52BA7@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <491A44A6-1409-4D9E-AEFD-2B8665D52BA7@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew P." List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:13:51 -0000 Erm, well 60+Mbytes is no wonder in a Gigabit environment (and it is too much of a wonder in a FastEthernet one), but I'm interested in getting 100Mbit hardware to work at full speed. Thanks for your 2 cents anyway, Andrew P. On 7/27/05, Sean Hafeez wrote: > I get 60+Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Mac via NFS. I get > 40-60Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Windows 2K box via Samba. Good > NICs help. Intel 10/100 Pro. >=20 > Google for Samba tuning also. >=20 > -Sean >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Jul 26, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Andrew P. wrote: >=20 > > Hello all! > > > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. > > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. > > > > But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine > > and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http servers, > > different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, > > etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not > > critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, > > but is there something wrong? > > > > I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even > > slower. Wazzup?.. > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew P. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >=20 >