From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 17:35:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA1016A4CE; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:35:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao05.cox.net (lakermmtao05.cox.net [68.230.240.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E474843D31; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:35:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz ([68.103.32.140]) by lakermmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP id <20040811173517.NCGW28993.lakermmtao05.cox.net@mezz>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:35:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:35:14 -0500 To: "Roman Bogorodskiy" References: <200408091253.i79CrT8k058076@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040811104830.GA709@lame.novel.ru> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040811104830.GA709@lame.novel.ru> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Linux, build 751) cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/fluxbox Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:35:24 -0000 On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:48:30 +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Jeremy wrote: > >> mezz 2004-08-09 12:53:29 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> x11-wm/fluxbox Makefile >> Log: >> fluxbox-devel will merging into fluxbox sometime later when 1.0 is >> released, >> so I shall take the maintainership. > > I think that fluxbox 0.1 should be kept in ports tree when 1.0 will be > released, becouse I know really many people who don't like the way in > which fluxbox-devel is developing, or maybe like the old style tabs, > etc. So, I think when 0.1 will be released, it should be handled in a > such way: > > fluxbox -> fluxbox01 > fluxbox-devel -> fluxbox I don't care, I am not going to keep the old Fluxbox. Whomever want to stick with the old Fluxbox, then he/she will _have_ to agree to maintain this port and submit it to PR for the repo copy request. I see no point to keep the old, because it's very unmaintain by the developers. The old style tab will be back in as optional that can be switch to new and old style by user's choice. This is what I have heard few weeks ago, but I don't know if it will happen for real. BTW: Please don't drop the CC, I rather to see this dicsuss to be open to everyone. Cheers, Mezz > -Roman Bogorodskiy -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org