Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 07:22:54 +0900 (JST) From: Jun Ebihara <jun@soum.co.jp> To: marklmi@yahoo.com, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 14: Poll armv6 deprecated or removed Message-ID: <20211105.072254.38751976526754162.jun@soum.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <341A49EC-241C-43E7-8380-D2EE2F8C59F4@yahoo.com> References: <B559CC04-6D09-4BC1-A182-1DA424D3134B@yahoo.com> <YYRE6HTEaVm8%2Bsz1@ceres.zyxst.net> <341A49EC-241C-43E7-8380-D2EE2F8C59F4@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 14: Poll armv6 deprecated or removed
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:18:36 -0700
> The lack of a variety of sources of armv6 or ARM11 that NetBSD
> supports is likely a kind of property being referenced: even for
> NetBSD no other ARM11's are targeted.
When I start to make NetBSD image for RPI,
I got so many good feedbacks then any other
hardwares(earmv7/i386/amd64/dreamcast/zaurus/...).
> Basically, even for NetBSD, one has to be interested in supporting
> (some) RPi*'s in order to be interested in supporting ARM11. There
> is not much of any other ARM11 market for NetBSD (or FreeBSD).
>> I'm interested to know what NetBSD's reasons are in having tier-1
>> support for armv6, but I'll ask that on their lists.
For NetBSD,armv6 RPI board can make armv5/armv6/armv7 images.
NetBSD still support armv5 era.
armv5: still boot!
armv6: rust can't build because luck of support.omxplayer works.
armv7: rust works,but firefox build failed.omxplayer works.
aarch64: rust works and firefox works fine.and apple-m1 compatible.
omxplayer can't works.
--
Jun Ebihara
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20211105.072254.38751976526754162.jun>