From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 23 21:53:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A7216A403; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB6D13C471; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0NLpsN3060419; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:52:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l0NLpsI8060416; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:51:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:51:54 -0800 (PST) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: Sam Leffler In-Reply-To: <45B68169.1060207@errno.com> Message-ID: <20070123135124.D58870@ns1.feral.com> References: <20070123173026.E692416A4CD@hub.freebsd.org> <45B65710.4060607@root.org> <20070123105009.G41619@ns1.feral.com> <45B65E4C.2050306@errno.com> <20070123112723.P43982@ns1.feral.com> <45B66458.9030406@errno.com> <20070123125236.U51690@ns1.feral.com> <45B68169.1060207@errno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Nate Lawson Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@freebsd.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:53:24 -0000 > > Nothing. I just thought I was suggesting something in-between what we > have now and a pure ascii mechanism like hints that requires in-kernel > parsing. > You are. With mucho respect I would have to say that it doesn't interest me all that much.