From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 30 17:11:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nisser.com (c0039.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.0.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEC437B719 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:11:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roelof@nisser.com) Received: from nisser.com (roelof [10.0.0.2]) by nisser.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id DAA24532 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 03:11:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roelof@nisser.com) Message-ID: <3AC52ED4.545DD7A@nisser.com> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 03:11:48 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga Organization: Nisser - Nr. 1 in Veiligheid X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: discrepancy repquota versus du -k; HUGE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In short: nl:/usr/local/etc/rc.d# repquota -u -a | grep ^dijkstra dijkstra-assrn -- 1090 0 0 307 0 0 nl:/usr/local/etc/rc.d# du -k -d 0 /home/intraction/dijkstra-assrn/ 1430 /home/intraction/dijkstra-assrn/ Well, this amounts to a discrepancy of almost 50%. So I'm wondering, that causes this slack? Or which of the two is more accurate. So I'm thinking of giving users some 50K 1K blocks each. Also, nl:/usr/local/etc/rc.d# quot -k /dev/twed0s1h /dev/twed0s1h: 3519 roelof 2442 root 1090 dijkstra-assrn ... du(3): erwise getbsize(3) is used to determine the preferred block size. Par- tial numbers of blocks are rounded up. IOW, slack. Does that account for it? Just wondering, mind. Roelof To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message