From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 3 08:18:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671A837B401 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 08:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55D543FF9 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 08:18:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 19Y5r3-0001DS-00 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 18:18:37 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 18:18:37 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: Subject: tunning 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 15:18:40 -0000 hi, i run a small program that writes to file, these are the numbers Fbsd local disk nfs ---- ---------- ---- 4.8 44.86 42.54 5.1 34.37 16.42 are these values (MB/s) acceptable? comments? while disk io is less that 30% slower, network is over 60% slower! danny