From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 05:52:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05FE1065673 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 05:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E928FC13 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 05:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn14 with SMTP id hn14so1454479wib.13 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:52:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.106.202 with SMTP id gw10mr2588233wib.3.1327125176261; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:52:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.47] (paris.c-mal.com. [88.170.200.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gy6sm1408380wib.11.2012.01.20.21.52.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:52:55 -0800 (PST) References: <4F180C83.9090100@my.gd> <4F19279F.6060303@a1poweruser.com> <201201202243.01861.koggybsd@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <56EE9CA1-8AFF-4FD5-A1DC-D33A3B3B45DC@my.gd> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:52:31 +0100 To: Michael Sierchio Cc: gore , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Horrible installer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 05:52:57 -0000 On 21 Jan 2012, at 05:47, Michael Sierchio wrote: > I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2.1, and.... IMHO, the 9.0 installer SUX! > It blow chunks. It's a POS. It's crap. It is a joke. >=20 > I hope I made myself clear. ;-) >=20 > - M Just because you see things a certain way doesn't make them a fact. It's your personal opinion and other people's mileage may vary. Since you're a fbsd user from 2.x, certainly you're WAY beyond needing the i= nstaller and just unpack the base system + kern + src + ports and install th= em manually. Refer my earlier post on the subject. Perhaps if you're unhappy with the new installer you should have submitted f= eedback about it before -RELEASE hit the road. Last but not least I find your calling the new installer a "pos" highly disr= espectful towards the people that invested time, energy and money in it.