Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:52:31 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> Cc: gore <koggybsd@comcast.net>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Horrible installer Message-ID: <56EE9CA1-8AFF-4FD5-A1DC-D33A3B3B45DC@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y70JUan=Tp6vLqsRe%2BX1h3pCebMJornjv=WE71rzRaksZQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <BLU160-W54C133B8003EF140C41EF7AE860@phx.gbl> <4F180C83.9090100@my.gd> <4F19279F.6060303@a1poweruser.com> <201201202243.01861.koggybsd@comcast.net> <CAHu1Y70JUan=Tp6vLqsRe%2BX1h3pCebMJornjv=WE71rzRaksZQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 Jan 2012, at 05:47, Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> wrote: > I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2.1, and.... IMHO, the 9.0 installer SUX! > It blow chunks. It's a POS. It's crap. It is a joke. >=20 > I hope I made myself clear. ;-) >=20 > - M Just because you see things a certain way doesn't make them a fact. It's your personal opinion and other people's mileage may vary. Since you're a fbsd user from 2.x, certainly you're WAY beyond needing the i= nstaller and just unpack the base system + kern + src + ports and install th= em manually. Refer my earlier post on the subject. Perhaps if you're unhappy with the new installer you should have submitted f= eedback about it before -RELEASE hit the road. Last but not least I find your calling the new installer a "pos" highly disr= espectful towards the people that invested time, energy and money in it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56EE9CA1-8AFF-4FD5-A1DC-D33A3B3B45DC>