From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 29 06:46:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F26FE7D; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryanv@daemoninthecloset.org) Received: from torment.daemoninthecloset.org (torment.daemoninthecloset.org [94.242.209.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C098F2912; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sage.daemoninthecloset.org (unknown [70.114.209.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "sage.daemoninthecloset.org", Issuer "daemoninthecloset.org" (verified OK)) by torment.daemoninthecloset.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFBE342C08C6; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:52:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemoninthecloset.org X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemoninthecloset.org Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 01:46:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Bryan Venteicher To: Andre Oppermann Message-ID: <2112475076.435.1377758792082.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org> In-Reply-To: <521E78B0.6080709@freebsd.org> References: <521E41CB.30700@yandex-team.ru> <521E78B0.6080709@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Network stack changes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.10.20] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.2_GA_5569 (ZimbraWebClient - GC20 ([unknown])/8.0.2_GA_5569) Thread-Topic: Network stack changes Thread-Index: anDUShTn7iVw7wFEqZDuK6ld/6VXsQ== Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" , adrian@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, luigi@freebsd.org, ae@FreeBSD.org, Gleb Smirnoff , FreeBSD Net X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:46:54 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- > On 28.08.2013 20:30, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > > Hello list! > > Hello Alexander, > > you sent quite a few things in the same email. I'll try to respond > as much as I can right now. Later you should split it up to have > more in-depth discussions on the individual parts. > > > > We already have some capabilities like VLANHWFILTER/VLANHWTAG, we can add > > some more. We even have > > per-driver hooks to program HW filtering. > > We could. Though for vlan it looks like it would be easier to remove the > hardware vlan tag stripping and insertion. It only adds complexity in all > drivers for no gain. > In the shorter term, can we remove the requirement for the parent interface to support IFCAP_VLAN_HWTAGGING in order to do checksum offloading on the VLAN interface (see vlan_capabilities())?