From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 2 06:35:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85121106566C; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 06:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643E98FC0C; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 06:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pB26ZDVk088953; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 22:35:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pB26ZDkk088952; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 22:35:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 22:35:13 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Adrian Chadd Message-ID: <20111202063513.GB88903@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20111202015133.GA4111@dragon.NUXI.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-current , Max Khon Subject: Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 06:35:13 -0000 On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:41:00PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 2 December 2011 09:51, David O'Brien wrote: > > > Wow, a single day of discussion in freebsd-current@ was sufficient to > > invert a 17 year default. > > > > I'd like to see the profile libs remain built by default in -CURRENT. > > > > If you like, add it to the list of things to disable on -STABLE creation. > > It's easier to do that than go review/re-engineer bloated code. :) > To what does "that" refer? -- Steve