From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 11 14:40:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB171065676 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073AB8FC13 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBD126.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.209.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id pBBEe2hp097543; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:40:03 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pBBEdpp9052987; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:39:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBBEdXVI064559; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:39:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201112111439.pBBEdXVI064559@fire.js.berklix.net> To: giffunip@tutopia.com From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:56:58 PST." <1322942218.7666.YahooMailClassic@web113505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:39:33 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVS removal from the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:40:05 -0000 "Pedro F. Giffuni" wrote: > Hi Daniel; > > --- On Sat, 12/3/11, Daniel Eischen wrote: > ... > > > > I would love to mirror the SVN repo in the same way > > and have an 'svn' in base, or at least something that > > could replace CVS in the above scenario. > > > > I have to say I am surprised by all the people that > still use CVS (for their own good reasons). > > It still would be helpful if cvs users could evaluate > OpenCVS: it's been experimental for ages now. It does > seem to have some advantage (other than the license) > in that it's smaller and better maintained (or at > least not too dead). Did you test it with cd /usr/src/release ; make release Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.