From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 3 19:18:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EFE9E58 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 19:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17CF22463 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 19:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s73JIB62040432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 20:18:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s73JIB62040432 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1407093494; bh=de02zNIrmQjOBUal5eaISCKV8o1gCrLpdz5ZBASkQFA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Sun,=2003=20Aug=202014=2020:18:09=20+0100|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-ports@ freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20How=20do=20maintainer=20updates=20wor k=20with=20bugzilla?|References:=20<53DE72E1.1010005@ee.lbl.gov>|I n-Reply-To:=20<53DE72E1.1010005@ee.lbl.gov>; b=F0MT2X0OIFB9RzHPCx/oynAUFWAIAn0EkHyfq5sVHq9EeM8dyFSJvX2OTIbM9wzXn 10EbQmTfhUsLDPWNuoErk53kjvH0mEKpO9vEZ1B6qslwQpTmddnrk6atm2hQTGUayG MMpoSxDOUi4dXMO7/jF/vptggDXJRi/Mgzl2zug4= Message-ID: <53DE8AF1.6070206@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 20:18:09 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do maintainer updates work with bugzilla? References: <53DE72E1.1010005@ee.lbl.gov> In-Reply-To: <53DE72E1.1010005@ee.lbl.gov> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=E1ECF9BB Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l1KlpR0hhjPLk9PVf8TtbwCBC9w2hL1fj" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 19:18:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --l1KlpR0hhjPLk9PVf8TtbwCBC9w2hL1fj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/08/2014 18:35, Craig Leres wrote: > At the end of last month I used send-pr to post a maintainer-update to > security/bro and security/broccoli. I see now I should have used the ne= w > bugzilla web interface. That day I received a request an email asking > for maintainer approval. I immediately replied to that but the status i= s > still "Approval Needed". >=20 > What am I doing wrong? I take it you mean PR 192105 ? By virtue of sending a PR into the system a leres@ee.lbl.gov account will have been created in Bugzilla. You should be able to use the 'Forgot Password' link to set a password on that account, then log in and add a flag to the attached diff to say 'maintainer approved'. Once that's done it should get triaged and if you're lucky, set to 'Patch Ready' in which case someone with a commit bit can go ahead and commit the update. You'll help that to happen if you can supply a link to Redports or the output from 'poudriere testport' or similar showing that your update passes some sanity checks. (It's not mandatory for PR submitters to supply this sort of testing output, but it pretty much is mandatory for all patches to be tested in this way before they are committed. So if you do it yourself, you can make it quicker and easier for any committer to proceed.) Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --l1KlpR0hhjPLk9PVf8TtbwCBC9w2hL1fj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJT3oryXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATmt0P/1IgFzNBtUOxoE7POdbz/kji BTI9Mlv1aOn1DfLZVMlnJw4551orNwXPOP2oDEm4Z+Tj8SGNfahA8ACtEbhYvCYi osdpG/YQEI4KMGbctRsqXmz2/CQ/W0nV+W7T10kGGYeKtTnh/OQemZDlGMY+QEAO FnKL5HbWHeUZPZ22IPQYLUiD22sQ+JN5Pk520a1/4jLSKpZJiVYzwb9aIkd1iNiX uo6KdacDlJeVmw+N6frIuCBkAN1eGByixNRt6cXaGSA4cRvOAoX9Xc9/+A1HpWmY 7/vfSN/4mWXUQ7jRJFDGfIY9ZJXK/09h/6oa8kvnNb6Cb/UtBEgSY7NU8oktcKMu QeFOZ4bXEPCLOSiejKAnECs/68gAPRZ7VtY1JDdbfQMWVyt5YJx5TGIvIe8PODP9 kRQ+Zff5spFevA987R0SjCgwl7UjLXtfKH24JWpUj0srsey5OEiIWQ63nc3/usGa LydemzOxExn0prfsBbM1VBtPZM9RH5GG2ooeU+Iq0ZzVCGRziDjL5botIex6PjoV fUgkbXa67iEz6lApY0Qwn7r9BytJvbXOiPwwmgy5WMN9bMUKy+xPP5lV+lrkPDXI qz/Xa/BOLhdfOuoaddxDONgQGg5wmUyN/l5tMw06tuCoJWs9OyHPXVYRB/NTcNCb uf9x/95nd+K3SZe41xew =75DZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l1KlpR0hhjPLk9PVf8TtbwCBC9w2hL1fj--