From owner-cvs-all Thu Jan 11 15: 6:48 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9473B37B699; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:06:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from slave (Studded@slave [10.0.0.1]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11687; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:06:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:06:12 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton X-X-Sender: To: Matt Dillon Cc: Sheldon Hearn , , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc crontab rc src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/mtree BSD.root.dist src/libexec Makefile src/libexec/save-entropy Makefile save-entropy.sh In-Reply-To: <200101111901.f0BJ1jU72510@earth.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Matt Dillon wrote: > This whole entropy thing has been a holy mess, and placing the file > in / makes it even more of a mess. We don't need the level > of randomness-paranoia that is being programmed into the system. Well YOU might not need it Matt, but personally I think the whole Yarrow concept is incredibly cool, and I like the idea of freebsd taking the lead in something, especially an area that's so important to system security. Am I the only one who sees how this is ultimately going to broaden our potential market base? Wouldn't you like to have part of the system that is actually more secure than openbsd? Yes, there is some pain involved in the process. But -current is so broken right now that I have a hard time believing that this is the issue that people are devovting so much energy to. Doug -- "The most difficult thing in the world is to know how to do a thing and to watch someone else do it wrong without comment." -- Theodore H. White Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message