From owner-freebsd-chat Sun May 3 19:43:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA25277 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sun, 3 May 1998 19:43:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA25246 for ; Sun, 3 May 1998 19:42:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA09947; Mon, 4 May 1998 02:42:48 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id EAA02096; Mon, 4 May 1998 04:42:44 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980504044244.39282@follo.net> Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 04:42:44 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: John Kelly Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/ijb - Imported sources References: <19980503230438.48318@follo.net> <19980504032939.07389@follo.net> <354d2457.225839725@mail.cetlink.net> <19980504042649.61453@follo.net> <354e28ff.227031838@mail.cetlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <354e28ff.227031838@mail.cetlink.net>; from John Kelly on Mon, May 04, 1998 at 02:35:44AM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 02:35:44AM +0000, John Kelly wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 1998 04:26:49 +0200, Eivind Eklund > wrote: > >>> I don't have to view pornography. I can "filter" it to pervent it >>> from coming into my home. Same principle applies for any other >>> information content coming into my home. I can filter it any way I >>> want. In my home, my right to privacy supersedes any advertisers' >>> rights. >> >> Besides, you're not able to type coherently. There is no privacy involved. > > On the contrary, there is. What about the part before 'besides'? What about _any_ underpinning of your claim? I can agree that there is an issue of being allowed to control what is going on in your own home (which you're not, in any country that I know of). However, that is _not_ the same as privacy. Please come with some form of argument. > You're losing the debate so now you resort to insults. You seem to be unable to answer any arguments, and thus go for language. So, for the understanding-impaired, I'll rephrase: What makes you claim that there is privacy involved? If you can't come up with something that resemble a coherent argument, I will still consider you to be unable to type coherently. Random sentences which follow the general rules of english isn't good enough - there must be coherency at the semantic level, too. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message