Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:52:03 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193916] Update port: vsftpd-ext update to staged. Message-ID: <bug-193916-13-o7d2YZBcFB@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193916-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193916-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193916 Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Triage |In Discussion CC| |pi@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Xu Jing from comment #0) > Created attachment 147663 [details] > diff base on ports tree r366889, because delete by r366890 Thanks. I tested it and it builds on poudriere (10.0-amd64, 9.1-amd64 and 8.4-i386). I have a few questions: - Is there a reason 2.3.5 is used and not 3.0.2 ? - Can you use @sample in pkg-plist instead of exec/unexec ? See https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/plist-keywords.html#plist-keywords-sample for details. - pkg-plist uses some shell script to detect/create users. Would using /usr/ports/UIDs etc work ? With USERS=ftp GROUPS=ftp ? - Can you check if you can trim your @dirrm in pkg-plist ? See https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2014-September/074391.html for details on the changes related to @dirrm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193916-13-o7d2YZBcFB>