Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 19:35:22 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com.au> To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>, max@wide.ad.jp, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache Makefile ports/www/apache/filesMakefile Makefile.SSL md5 md5.SSL ports/www/apache/patchespatch-aa patch-ab patch-ac patch-ad patch-ae patch-af patch-agpatch-ah ports/www/apache/patches.SSL patch-aa patch-ab patch-ac ... Message-ID: <199707271135.TAA07011@spinner.dialix.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 27 Jul 1997 15:11:38 %2B0400." <Pine.BSF.3.96.970727150715.8613A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jul 1997, Satoshi Asami wrote: [..] > > Peter, what should we do? For apache-stable, I think we just need to > > resurrect apache and update (downdate?) it to the latest stable > > version. > > > As far apache-current...I don't know. Is it safe to repository copy > > apache right over it? It should be, if the versions of all files are > > newer, right? > > I have nothing against history resurrection, if you insist on purity here. > History can be resurrected for both apache-stable and apache-current, > first step will be restoring from the Attic and next will be merging > with latest variant. My preference (in sequence): ressurect "apache" in-place, and revert it to 1.2.1. repository copy "apache" to "apache-ssl", while renaming pkg and pkg.SSL etc. remove ssl stuff from "apache" remove non-ssl stuff from "apache-ssl". repository copy "apache" to "apache-current" or "apache13" update "apache-current" or "apache13" to 1.3a1 from the present version. at this point, we have apache -> 1.2.1, apache-ssl -> 1.1.1 (or whatever) and apache-current (or apache13) with history back to beginning of time. At some point when 1.3 becomes "stable" or "released", we can consider copying the 1.3 port contents back to "apache" without loosing much from the 1.2 era. If 1.2.1 is the end of the 1.2 development, then this is probably quite safe. Cheers, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707271135.TAA07011>