Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:23:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de> To: Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org> Cc: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: procom aal0 mode Message-ID: <20030619092050.A630@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> In-Reply-To: <20030618224457.GA22134@fork> References: <20030618213150.GA20365@fork> <200306190012.31245.vjardin@wanadoo.fr> <20030618224457.GA22134@fork>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: AM>Ahh yes, thanks - that looks about right. I was hoping for natm support AM>(AAL0 mode there looks like just what I need), but I don't have any Midway AM>cards, only Procom. AM> AM>> PS: Why do you need to receive or to send an AAL0 cell ? Unfortunately, it is AM>> not well supported by the HARP stack ;-( (there is no AAL0 ATM socket). AM> AM>We have some custom embedded devices that we use ATM as a transport for, AM>but nothing else; it used to run on Linux but we are switching to FreeBSD AM>now and looking for a good point to hook into the driver. I'm just starting to put together a NATM driver for the ProSums. It will support AAL0 (through netgraph). NB: the hatm driver I just commited supports AAL0. On a 1GHz machine I can route up to 150000cells/sec through the kernel. harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030619092050.A630>