From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 21:54:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F5B16A406 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 21:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao106.cox.net (eastrmmtao106.cox.net [68.230.240.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A8513C4BE for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 21:54:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070510215433.OYME12193.eastrmmtao106.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 10 May 2007 17:54:33 -0400 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id xZuX1W0094iy4EG0000000; Thu, 10 May 2007 17:54:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:57:17 -0500 To: "Wojciech A. Koszek" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070510134740.GA39021@FreeBSD.czest.pl> <200705101342.l4ADgCgg007728@lurza.secnetix.de> <20070510221221.GA44910@FreeBSD.czest.pl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20070510221221.GA44910@FreeBSD.czest.pl> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.20 (Linux) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We don't really need two FTP daemons X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:54:33 -0000 On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:12:21 -0500, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:34:31AM -0700, gnn@freebsd.org wrote: >> At Thu, 10 May 2007 15:42:12 +0200 (CEST), >> Oliver Fromme wrote: >> > >> > I think it would make sense to move lukemftpd to ports and >> > remove it from the base system. It might be worth noting >> > that lukemftp (the client) already is in ports. >> > >> > Well, in fact I'm not convinced that there has to be an >> > FTP daemon in the base system at all. But I guess it's not >> > possible to reach a consensus on removing all ftpds from >> > the base completely. >> > >> >> Getting to one would be a good move. >> >> Wojchiech, are you proposing a patch to do the removal? It would be >> good to see what you propose removing, just for safety sake. >> > > George, > > Here's a patch that should be complete lukemftpd(8) removal: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~wkoszek/patches/no-lukemftpd.patch.bz2 > > Just to describe -- those elements are gone: > > - src/libexec/lukemftpd > > - lukemftpd's entry in src/libexec/Makefile > > - src/contrib/lukemftpd > > - lukemftpd lines in inetd.conf(8) > > It survived buildworld and installworld stage. Plan to add entries in src/ObsoleteFiles.inc? Cheers, Mezz > Thanks, -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org