From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 7 20:55:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394761065675 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CBF8FC16 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from vampire.homelinux.org (dslb-088-064-182-012.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.64.182.12]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKwtQ-1K55Rh3P05-0004FA; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:55:29 +0200 Received: (qmail 44830 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2008 20:53:27 -0000 Received: from myhost.laiers.local (192.168.4.151) by router.laiers.local with SMTP; 7 Jun 2008 20:53:27 -0000 From: Max Laier Organization: FreeBSD To: Jo Rhett Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:54:42 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <9B7FE91B-9C2E-4732-866C-930AC6022A40@netconsonance.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806072254.43405.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+/t8URHlg1QwvpFJI2sqBUCD5XitA1qpXYGFp b5PV+A+lRMxtNIpO6fNCIcNAYoT1jUO0zC6nHIwdoGgOm2TzGy 8+QJiXKNFQev5uVJ81zSA== Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland Subject: Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:55:32 -0000 On Saturday 07 June 2008 21:41:18 Jo Rhett wrote: > On Jun 5, 2008, at 2:45 AM, Steven Hartland wrote: > > You are still fail to take to the time to even tell people what these > > bugs are, no ones a mind reader! > > > > People are trying to help you here but all I'm hearing is a child > > like "It doesn't work fix it", with no willingness to even explain > > what it is or provide resources to test if someone found the time to > > investigate > > your issues. > > Given this I don't see how you can expect these so called issues to > > ever get fixed. > > I think you are misunderstanding the point at hand. I'm not trying to > address specific issues. (I'd be happy to in another thread next > week). This thread was created to address the overall well-documented > list of bugs in 6.3, which is the *only* supported stable version of > the operating system. (7.0 is even less stable) > > The most stable (by numbers of bugs and numbers of reported problems) > is 6.2. > > I see no valid reasoning that can be backed up by numbers as to why > 6.2 should be EoL. That's the point I'm addressing. The specific > bugs that affect us are not necessarily relevant to the overall > stability. And anyone can do the same searches on the bug list to > confirm these numbers for themselves. Here is a cluebat for you: Messages in this flamboyant thread of yours: 113 and counting Messages in support of your claim not sent by yourself: 0 Now please: STFU or invest your time into something more productive. By the way, for somebody who claims to have no time to provide details about the bugs that make 6.3 so bad you seem to have a lot of time to send bogus emails (26 since Wednesday). If you had only spend a bit of that time into actual bughunting ... -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News