From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 16 16:34:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED79D37B423; Sat, 16 Sep 2000 16:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gorean.org (doug@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA50575; Sat, 16 Sep 2000 16:32:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Message-ID: <39C40314.3156342A@gorean.org> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 16:32:36 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-091 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Brandon D. Valentine" Cc: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" , Soren Schmidt , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 release on September 25th References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Brandon D. Valentine" wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Doug Barton wrote: > > > One solution to this is to tend to your local sources with cvs instead > >of cvsup. That way when you update your patches will be preserved. If > >you don't want to keep a complete repo locally, anoncvs will still allow > >you to use cvs to stay up to date. > > Of course, he could also learn to use cvsup's refuse file to keep the > patch in place. The problem with that is that you don't catch real updates to the file. Doug -- "The dead cannot be seduced." - Kai, "Lexx" Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message