From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 30 14:51:02 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 975)
 id CC7F23C9; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:51:02 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:51:02 +0000
From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: suspend/resume on Lenovo X1 (regression from reports on wiki)
Message-ID: <20130830145102.GG32399@FreeBSD.org>
References: <521D03AE.3050709@sics.se> <20130828040505.GD32399@FreeBSD.org>
 <521DF184.7030308@sics.se> <20130828150310.GR4574@glebius.int.ru>
 <20130830031424.GF32399@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAJ-VmokcQOhAE6y_=J1uzPHneSF+jYSpdo+wdf7Gd0h36pRHwQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokcQOhAE6y_=J1uzPHneSF+jYSpdo+wdf7Gd0h36pRHwQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Laura Marie Feeney <lmfeeney@sics.se>,
 "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>,
 Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:51:02 -0000

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:39:59AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 29 August 2013 20:14, Sergey A. Osokin <osa@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:03:10PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > >   Laura,
> > >
> > >   Now bad news :) Last major Xorg update in ports, which happened couple
> > > of months ago, introduced a regression: xorg performs very slowly after
> > > resume. If the server process is restarted, then a new one performs okay.
> >
> > Agree with Gleb.  Kind of a slowness exist after resume.
> >
> Can y'all grab some basic, naive benchmarks (disk, CPU) and compare them
> before/after a suspend/resume cycle?

Unfortunately, I'm not sure what I need to check...

-- 
Sergey A. Osokin
osa@FreeBSD.org