From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 20 22:18:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E501516A4CE for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:18:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chilled.skew.org (skew.org [65.101.207.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DF243D49 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:18:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@skew.org) Received: from chilled.skew.org (localhost.skew.org [127.0.0.1]) by chilled.skew.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAKMIa5N047098 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:18:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mike@chilled.skew.org) Received: (from mike@localhost) by chilled.skew.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iAKMIaiW047097 for ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:18:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mike) From: Mike Brown Message-Id: <200411202218.iAKMIaiW047097@chilled.skew.org> To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:18:36 -0700 (MST) X-Whoa: whoa. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL90 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: bsd.port.Mk error X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:18:37 -0000 1. line 562 of bsd.port.Mk: "dependancies" should be "dependencies" 2. I accidentally typed "make" in a directory that did not have a Makefile, and got this error: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1459: Bad X_WINDOW_SYSTEM setting I do not have X11 installed on my system. I don't see anything in the Makefile that would have resulted in arriving at line 1459. If OSVERSION is being set by "/sbin/sysctl -n kern.osreldate" then it is "490102", and AFAIK, XFREE86_VERSION is not defined. Therefore around line 1180, X_WINDOW_SYSTEM should be set to "xfree86-4", and the elif around line 1424 should kick in. But somehow it falls through to the else. Any ideas? -Mike